Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite A350

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite A350  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA KTKAA
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 51.8
37% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 68.5
8-Core 70.2
9% 69.3 Pts
64-Core 71.1
4% 71.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650
Toshiba(1179 FF01) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.2
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2.2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 68 64 65 64 69 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.9% Poor
Read 170
Write 173
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 74.2
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 6.4
27% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 53.1
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 12
14% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 55%
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E632 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: JA0AB5N0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 104 103 102 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 105
Mixed 52
SusWrite 102
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A350 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback