To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 00:19
Run Duration2871 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 33.7
2-Core 65
36% 53.2 Pts
4-Core 67.2
8-Core 67.1
9% 67.1 Pts
64-Core 65.2
4% 65.2 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 LE
XFX(1682 2208) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.09%
Great: 0%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$40
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 87 89 83 98 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 83.3
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 176 176 178 180 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 146
Write 107
Mixed 64
SusWrite 177
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HDS722516VLAT20 165GB
55GB free
Firmware: V34OA6MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 47 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 50.6
Write 47.3
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 49.4
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 30%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
651GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 88 90 84 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 159
Write 168
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 85.2
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 8,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback