Today's hottest deals

Asus G75VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G75VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G75VX
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130227
Uptime16.9 Days
Run DateMar 27 '21 at 19:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 150
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 404
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670MX
Asus(1043 10AD) 3GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 16.8
10% 14.1 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 8.7
10% 13.2 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 413
Mixed 288
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 34.5
117% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 170
180% 297 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
384GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 59 68 96 96 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 99
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 79.1
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.7
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G75VX Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback