Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Precision M6800 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0F5HF3
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140502
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930MX 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 74 1-Core 101 2-Core 192 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 469 50% 398 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5100M 641 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Dell(1028 05CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 771 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 426.78 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 33.8 22% 33 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 26 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 512GB 457 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM03D0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 205 Write 108 Mixed 173 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 25.4 85% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 38 32% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 108%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 14GB free Firmware: 0003LIM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 114 113 115 93 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 114 Write 109 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 104 72% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 77%
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 32GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 4.1 6 6.7 6.6 7.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	9.56% Terrible	Read 29.7 Write 17 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 6.2 24% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.5 99% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.56% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,523 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,811 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

CPU
Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples	545x
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples	408x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	214x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,018x
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	341x
Quadro K4100MNvidiaBench 16%, 1,157 samples	192x

SSD
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples	53x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	50x
hynix SH920 2.5 256GBSKBench 73%, 2,404 samples	44x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	85x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	82x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16