Asus H81M-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-P  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '21 at 15:18
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 107
2-Core 181
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 271
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 35.3
Parallax 33.8
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 34
Splatting 24.1
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed H5-120G 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02000008
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 162
Mixed 244
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 27.1
102% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 1.6
28% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
102GB free
Firmware: KC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 60.3
70% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
148GB free
Firmware: KC48
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,568
Write 31
Mixed 71
1,115% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 619
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.7
26,236% 208 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback