Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10
Memory	240.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20201029
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 21 '21 at 16:56
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7402 24-Core 21 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 47.6 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 108 40% 68.8 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 430 43% 348 Pts	64-Core 1,993 123% 1,993 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZPLL3T2 3TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 237% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: GPJA2B3Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 1339 1383 1340 1459 1375 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	183% Outstanding	Read 734 Write 1525 Mixed 923 SusWrite 1,393 261% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 26.3 97% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 958 DQ Write 812 DQ Mixed 698 574% 823 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 299%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 16x16GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 16 of 32 slots used 256GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	190% Outstanding	MC Read 81.9 MC Write 60.6 MC Mixed 96.2 227% 79.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 24.8 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 190%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 30%

Raft

CPU
EPYC 7302 16-CoreAMDBench 55%, 54 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro P2200NvidiaBench 47%, 5,007 samples	1x

SSD
LOGICAL VOLUME 480GBHPEBench 82%, 22 samples	1x

RAM
P03051-191 P03051-191 P03051-191 P03051-191 P03051-191 P03051-191 96GBHPEBench 50%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16