Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520I AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520I AC  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 02:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$108
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 227
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 675
65% 537 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 31.1
19% 23.6 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 15.7
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 391 391 410 410 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 401
Mixed 391
SusWrite 356
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 27.6
132% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 41.5
81% 161 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 207 205 210 210 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD4U0836181BCW 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 85%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A520I AC Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520I AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback