Samsung R520/R522/R620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemSamsung R520/R522/R620  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R520/R522/R620
Memory3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8700-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 73
40% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 45.4
8-Core 72.6
7% 59 Pts
64-Core 72.7
4% 72.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.1)
Sanyo(144D C050) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 2.9
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 6.1
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$79
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 51 46 53 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 62.4
Write 62.1
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 51.4
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R520/R522/R620 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R520/R522/R620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback