Hp-pavilion KQ482AA-AB9 a6442.pt

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion KQ482AA-AB9 a6442.pt  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 08:21
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 54.5
36% 51 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 107
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 106
7% 106 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 035E) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2901.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.11% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 2
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.11%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid 120GB
53GB free
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 105 58 67 65 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 241
Write 243
Mixed 213
SusWrite 86.1
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 24.1
83% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 133
113% 166 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 98%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 34 30 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 112
Write 34.5
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 33.1
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 74%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
244GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 27.3
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 11
23% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
2TB free, PID 2323
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 25.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 10.5
29% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
233GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 27.8
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 11.2
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 44%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13
15GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 11 11 7.4 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Read 32.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 9.7
22% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
66% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KQ482AA-AB9 a6442.pt Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KQ482AA-AB9 a6442.pt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback