Lenovo 4291IW9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4291IW9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4291IW9
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 22:02
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 68
44% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 92.7
8-Core 119
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.7
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Reeinno FR256GB S1S3 240GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 27 21 42 3 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 432
Write 331
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 42.6
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 12
53% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 2.8
DQ Mixed 0.2
15% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback