Lenovo 33542E3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 33542E3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 33542E3
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 05:27
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 133
59% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 170
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5007) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.21 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team MP1 SSD 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.5% Good
Read 509
Write 370
Mixed 424
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 10.3
66% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 10.4
35% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
677GB free
Firmware: SM14 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 82.9
Write 117
Mixed 84.7
71% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 5.77
4K Mixed 0.74
220% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
Opnfiler VIRTUAL-DISK 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.39% Terrible
Read 5.87
Write 5.36
Mixed 6.47
4% 5.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.68
138% 0.85 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68E9W1600 04EF Team-Elite-1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback