Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 22:25
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 533
57% 452 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 95.3
Parallax 3
4% 34.2 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PNY CS3030 250GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3320 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 252 264 268 267 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 747
Write 790
Mixed 357
SusWrite 270
121% 541 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 23.7
138% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 332
254% 349 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 103%
Great: 208%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 135 177 142 142 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 450
Write 321
Mixed 287
SusWrite 172
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 41.4
142% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 170
176% 289 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 108%
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 256GB
151GB free
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 193 203 216 171 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 971
Write 204
Mixed 338
SusWrite 172
92% 421 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 23.9
79% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 25.9
DQ Mixed 35
59% 124 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 208%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.5
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback