Lenovo 20217

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20217  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO VIQY0Y1
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 53.5
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 62.3
33% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 163
17% 136 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 6.6
3% 7.57 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 292 294 271 266 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 469
Write 329
Mixed 290
SusWrite 282
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 23.6
110% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 254
212% 305 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 129%
Transcend MTS400 M.2 128GB-$80
97GB free
Firmware: 20140516
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 147 148 148 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 369
Write 143
Mixed 197
SusWrite 148
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 28.2
94% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 150
127% 188 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 84%
Adata Premier Pro SP920 512GB-$95
232GB free
Firmware: 1.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 92 98 49 97 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 178
Write 53.6
Mixed 156
SusWrite 103
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 18.8
52% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 72.9
89% 156 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FSGG45F-D8MMB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20217 Builds (Compare 1,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20217

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback