Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S (all builds)
Motherboard	Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S
Memory	374.4 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '21 at 17:55
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 77.2 2-Core 155 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 600 53% 450 Pts	64-Core 1,944 120% 1,944 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 479GB 811GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 579 566 538 588 597 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	87.6% Excellent	Read 718 Write 604 Mixed 350 SusWrite 574 126% 562 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 19.6 66% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 55.3 DQ Write 92.9 DQ Mixed 77.3 58% 75.2 MB/s

LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 959GB 1TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 420 394 345 410 414 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	63.5% Good	Read 431 Write 440 Mixed 347 SusWrite 400 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 15.3 67% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 64 DQ Mixed 41.3 31% 39.7 MB/s

LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 479GB 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 294 283 259 298 297 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	Read 337 Write 343 Mixed 268 SusWrite 288 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 18.3 68% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 19.4 17% 24.4 MB/s

LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 299GB 404GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 586 570 542 582 581 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.6% Very good	Read 634 Write 566 Mixed 130 SusWrite 573 106% 476 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 4.9 46% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 85.5 DQ Write 23.2 DQ Mixed 9 18% 39.2 MB/s

LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 999GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 218 217 218 223 218 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	123% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 203 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 219 128% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.5 330% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 123%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 77GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 26.8 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 11.4 18% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 348% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 4.5 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.54% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 4 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.3 8% 7.57 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.54% Great: 9%
WD Elements SE 2623 4TB 139 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 77GB free, PID 2623 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 26.3 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 10.7 30% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 66%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 16TB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 14.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 30.3 Write 26.7 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 10.4 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.3 195% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B2G70DB0-YK0 24x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 24 of 24 slots used 384GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (91^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 38.5 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 30.4 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.8 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	32	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363