Today's hottest deals

HP ProBook 4710s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 4710s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3074
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 02:05
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5870
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 53.3
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 45.6
28% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 45.2
6% 45.1 Pts
64-Core 45.2
3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300
HP(103C 3074) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 124 120 106 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 196
Write 129
Mixed 111
SusWrite 119
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 12.2
56% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 43.3
54% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0227
Typical ProBook 4710s Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4710s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback