Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu AMILO Pi 2540  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU F45
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 17:51
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7800
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 52
1-Core 17
2-Core 34.5
25% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 29.8
8-Core 35.1
4% 32.4 Pts
64-Core 33.8
2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1107) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 537
Write 394
Mixed 474
104% 469 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 16.3
148% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 92.5
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 14
26% 53.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 118%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
54GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 8.18
Mixed 7.9
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.43
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.008
13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AMILO Pi 2540 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu AMILO Pi 2540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback