Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 11AVCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 11AVCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3148
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 6-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 269
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 732
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 978
60% 978 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 520
Device(1642 1871) 2GB
CLim: 905 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.26.26
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9.4
6% 8.1 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 5.6
5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4M2QEXH7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 382 370 388 346 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,360
Write 2207
Mixed 1,576
SusWrite 487
370% 1,658 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 88
301% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 1,045
DQ Mixed 1060
785% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 263%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 3R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 27% 30 26 6 60 23.8" 1920 1080 ACR0475 Acer K242HYL
History:
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback