Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 209% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6242 31 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPU0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 80.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 916 82% 691 Pts	64-Core 4,203 260% 4,203 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 353 User benchmarks, average bench 159% HP(103C 129E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 431.94 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	164% Outstanding	Lighting 213 Reflection 218 Parallax 234 174% 222 fps	MRender 287 Gravity 228 Splatting 203 192% 239 fps
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 173%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HMLB-000H1 2TB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: EXB71H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2048 1980 1959 1869 1143 1149 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 2,029 Write 1,963 Mixed 1,497 SusWrite 1,691 404% 1,795 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 52.4 180% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 961 DQ Write 638 DQ Mixed 780 587% 793 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 328%
ST4000NM0165 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 3.5TB free Firmware: HPS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 213 214 215 212 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.7% Poor	Read 198 Write 181 Mixed 111 SusWrite 213 40% 176 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 0.6 10% 4.8 MB/s	DQ Read 0.5 DQ Write 7.4 DQ Mixed 3.5 3% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 63%
Seagate ST6000NM0235 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 5.5TB free Firmware: HPS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 196 196 196 194 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 25% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM 4x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 24 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 19.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.6 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 119%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	HPN3536 HP Z27

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 78%

Battleship

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples	63x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61341stBench 78%, 153 samples	55x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples	31x

GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	102x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	74x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	71x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	49x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 250%, 4,056 samples	41x
MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TBSamsungBench 267%, 633 samples	34x

RAM
HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 12x8GBHynixBench 112%, 37 samples	21x
HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK 4x31.8GBHynixBench 92%, 67 samples	18x
M393A2K40CB2-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 161 samples	17x