Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14-bw0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-bw0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8324
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 08:45
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 79.5
41% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 77.1
8-Core 71.7
10% 74.4 Pts
64-Core 74.2
5% 74.2 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 8324) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
0% 1.13 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
External USB3.0 500GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 24 14 24 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 18.8
15% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 1R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 12% 60 4 1 60 19.4" 1600 900 GSM4EED 20M35
History: Score 18: 0R 4G 6B | Score 34: 4R 2G 8B | Score 15: 1R 2G 4B
Typical Laptop 14-bw0xx Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-bw0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback