Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory12.6 GB free of 15 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 02:10
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 117
45% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 178
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 461.33
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.1% Very good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 151
Parallax 93.9
69% 110 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 86.1
Splatting 94.7
78% 95.7 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 59GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 63% Great: 67%
Google PersistentDisk 107GB
70GB free
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 91%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 249
Write 139
Mixed 182
SusWrite 30.2
112% 150 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 7.1
1,204% 6.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 10% 144 226 47 60 29.7" 1920 1080 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback