HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR 3664h
Memory	1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '17 at 10:27
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 38.6 2-Core 62.9 36% 53.4 Pts	4-Core 80.9 8-Core 80.2 11% 80.6 Pts	64-Core 83.9 5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galaxy GX0240ML105-G 256GB 422 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10387 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3567 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 65535 (A9) Unknown 100 100 34362490887 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 181 181 4324786500 (AF) Unknown 92 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1036 (C2) HDA temperature 60 60 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	50.1% Above average	Read 261 Write 211 Mixed 224 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 13.9 73% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 0.83 32% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 76%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 40GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 36GB free Firmware: 0203 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 30.5 Mixed 30.5 23% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.66 4K Write 7.32 4K Mixed 5.55 1,030% 6.51 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 3x1GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples	13x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	5x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	7x
G45/G43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 1%, 6,554 samples	6x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	6x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBElpidaBench 40%, 1,380 samples	5x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 33%, 1,255 samples	5x
F3-17000CL9-2GBXL0 F3-17000CL9-2GBXL0 F3-17000CL9-2GBXL0 F3-17000CL9-2GBXL0 8GBUnknownBench 21%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16