Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C660D-15E (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PWWBE
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 20:40
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 53 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 37.9 26% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 37.8 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 36.2 2% 36.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6465GSXN 640GB 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 519GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH101M SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 64 66 60 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 70.4 Write 67.1 Mixed 42 SusWrite 60.4 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	2%	60	18	12	60	15.5"	1366 768	LGD02DC

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16