HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z4 G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81C5
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2225 523 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 78.9 1-Core 137 2-Core 266 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 688 70% 567 Pts	64-Core 742 46% 742 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% HP(103C 82FC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.32.02 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44% Average	Lighting 53.2 Reflection 60.8 Parallax 90.8 43% 68.3 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 44.3 45% 56.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GB 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA71HAQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 651 637 612 629 643 639 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 1975 Write 1,769 Mixed 1,172 SusWrite 635 310% 1,388 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 89.2 4K Mixed 52.4 182% 62.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,055 DQ Write 890 DQ Mixed 989 736% 978 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 284%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 92 97 94 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 110 Write 101 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 94 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 1x16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.6% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 9.2 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 10 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24.1"	1280 720	DELA0B9 DELL U2415

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W-2123IntelBench 70%, 2,702 samples	634x
Xeon W-2133IntelBench 77%, 1,612 samples	306x
Xeon W-2125IntelBench 78%, 1,514 samples	291x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	370x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	347x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	328x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	273x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	219x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	88x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16