Today's hottest deals

Compal NBLB2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompal NBLB2  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal NBLB2
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 16:29
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 99.6
47% 76 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 157
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Compal(14C0 0043) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox 240GB 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-rm
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 211 214 211 210 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.3% Above average
Read 209
Write 199
Mixed 190
SusWrite 211
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 21.7
75% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 125
108% 161 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 97%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
695GB free
Firmware: GT001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 92 91 92 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 90.6
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 91.6
54% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
97GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.8 3 2.8 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 22.9
Write 23.4
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 2.9
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 27%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
821GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 24.6
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 22.3
34% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 8.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NBLB2 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Compal NBLB2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback