Notebook W54_55_94_95_97AU,AUQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 54% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook W54_55_94_95_97AU,AUQ  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W54_55_94_95_97AU,AUQ
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 12:09
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 29.8
2-Core 60.2
30% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 96.1
8-Core 101
13% 98.3 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD N18A 256GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 141 138 152 125 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 319
Write 310
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 125
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 9.2
48% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 0.3
43% 100 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 10 3 2 64 0" 1366 768
Typical W54_55_94_95_97AU,AUQ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W54_55_94_95_97AU,AUQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback