Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5736Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5736Z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE51_MV
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 17:00
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 50.4
36% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 65.4
8-Core 64.2
9% 64.8 Pts
64-Core 65.4
4% 65.4 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Familia Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 048A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.9
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 158
Write 234
Mixed 81.3
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 39
115% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 128
111% 165 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.13 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5736Z Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5736Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback