PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Boot Drive | 26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision M90 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0YD632 |
Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20081016 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 17 '21 at 23:43 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | NOR-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 T7600-$130
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk X210 512GB-$152
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X210706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.2 2.9 2.9 39 116 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
58GB free, PID 6410
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.3 11 25 MB/s
|
8.63%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
12.9%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 64 | 0" | 1280 720 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 T7600Intel $130Bench 34%, 622 samples | 3x |
Core2 T7200Intel $90Bench 32%, 2,351 samples | 2x |
Core2 T5600Intel $99Bench 31%, 1,304 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 31% - Below average | Total price: $196 |