Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X8DAH+F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X8DAH+F  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory42.8 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111230
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 169
57% 126 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 546
54% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 58% Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 186
Parallax 182
140% 180 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 185
Splatting 124
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$30
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 249 249 247 248 250 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
80.5% Excellent
Read 265
Write 253
Mixed 245
SusWrite 249
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 44.3
146% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 101
103% 168 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 127%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 257 253 257 256 256 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,881
Write 2,178
Mixed 2,024
SusWrite 259
356% 1,585 MB/s
4K Read 79.9
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 70.4
247% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 210
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 177%
Great: 177%
WD Gold 6TB (2016) -$225
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01M03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 199 199 201 205 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 197
Mixed 86
SusWrite 201
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.9
252% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
24GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 14 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 33
Write 17.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 14.6
21% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.8
192% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 38%
Generic 2.0 Reader -1 32GB
29GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 16.8
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 16.4
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 8R 3G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 30% 76 328 274 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AUS2420 ASUS VG24V
History: Score 58: 7R 5G 8B | Score 61: 8R 3G 12B
Typical X8DAH+F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro X8DAH+F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback