Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 11:56
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 258
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 585
53% 446 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 46.3
42% 49.3 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 31.9
24% 29 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1160
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,025
Write 1,394
Mixed 881
247% 1100 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 26.5
83% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 353
328% 513 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A4G8BAF-062E:B 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 25
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 1R 8G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 14% 101 43 27 60 34.1" 3440 1440 GSM5AE2 LG ULTRAWIDE
History: Score 13: 1R 1G 5B | Score 39: 4R 3G 10B | Score 34: 1R 8G 5B
Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback