Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60% Good
Memory 64.9
1-Core 74
2-Core 150
55% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 583
52% 440 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 86 84 80 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 120
Write 99.9
Mixed 103
SusWrite 83
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 7.7
26% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 32 0" 1280 720
Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback