Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20136

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20136  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G485
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 13:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-60 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 47.6
1-Core 14.9
2-Core 27.6
22% 30 Pts
4-Core 29
8-Core 28.9
4% 29 Pts
64-Core 29.5
2% 29.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290M
Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.6.0
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1
2% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 0.8
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST98823AS 80GB-$121
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 31 23 28 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 35.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 27.8
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HB3SU004GFM8MML16 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20136 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20136

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback