Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Memory 51.3 1-Core 11.2 2-Core 12.4 21% 25 Pts	4-Core 17.1 8-Core 21 2% 19 Pts	64-Core 21.4 1% 21.4 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 188B) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: Y201229a SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 161 127 133 183 195 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.4% Very poor	Read 110 Write 161 Mixed 52 SusWrite 149 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.2 3% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 11 10 9 6.9 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 10.7 Mixed 12 SusWrite 8.9 16% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 30% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JSF12864HZ-1G1F1 Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 3GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 533, 667 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.97% Terrible	MC Read 2.2 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 1.4 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.3 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.97% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	5x
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	1x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	1x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28