Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 10:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 120
53% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 350
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 113
Parallax 126
108% 124 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 103
Splatting 87.9
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$200
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 1339 1221 899 971 975 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 1,171
Mixed 979
SusWrite 1,126
239% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 40.7
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 457
332% 436 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 167%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 29.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 1R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 14% 64 104 15 60 34.1" 2560 1080 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback