Acer Aspire A515-46

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-46  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Calla_PK
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 126
43% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 285
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
Acer(1025 1552) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 14.6
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 11.5
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 421 427 448 453 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 368
Mixed 420
SusWrite 427
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 42.2
146% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 247
185% 247 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 8GB
2667, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 14
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 11.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0563
Typical Aspire A515-46 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-46

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback