Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Memory 20.3 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 17.3 12% 17.5 Pts	4-Core 20.1 8-Core 19.9 3% 20 Pts	64-Core 20 1% 20 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD2500LPCX-24C6HT0 250GB 894 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 57 76 70 70 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 79.4 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 65.2 47% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 57%
hp v232w 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 7d40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.3 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 6.4 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 6.5 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 61% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3190ME76F8F160 1x2GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.22% Terrible	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.2 2% 0.53 GB/s	Latency 319 13% 319 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.22% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 18%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-4300M APUAMD $88Bench 35%, 2,270 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 7420GAMDBench 2%, 1,918 samples	13x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3190ME76F8F160 1x2GBRamaxelBench 16%, 63 samples	5x
TMTS4G58DFRID-16K 1x4GBTeikonBench 18%, 123 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 9,805 samples	1x

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $121

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16