Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 58.1 1-Core 43.9 2-Core 64.8 37% 55.6 Pts	4-Core 66.1 8-Core 59.7 9% 62.9 Pts	64-Core 65.1 4% 65.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 194E) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xstar 128GB 128GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 236 245 246 240 232 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 321 Write 255 Mixed 250 SusWrite 236 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 7.7 56% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 15.3 45% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB 51,191 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	6x
CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GBCrucialBench 24%, 1,138 samples	5x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	5x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $88

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16