Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2537NZ9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 2537NZ9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2537NZ9
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 44
2-Core 89.8
40% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 114
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 93 109 104 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 198
Write 123
Mixed 131
SusWrite 108
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 16.7
53% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 59.9
54% 84.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 48%
SanDisk Ultra Luxe 32GB
24GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 17.3
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 15.1
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 029E CM3X4GSD1066 8GB
1334, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.7
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2537NZ9 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2537NZ9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $274WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback