Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 920
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 927 927 127 72 102 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 907
Write 930
Mixed 852
SusWrite 370
172% 765 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 66.4
248% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 402
366% 536 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 162%
Great: 185%
Kxg50pnv1t02 NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GB
592GB free
Firmware: AFDA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,069
Write 1,717
Mixed 1517
393% 1,768 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 75.6
260% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1033
DQ Write 1,041
DQ Mixed 829
680% 968 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 246%
Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G M.2 2280 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: ABDA4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 466 464 464 464 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 468
Mixed 335
SusWrite 465
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 44.6
164% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 234
188% 263 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FJ Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 35.5
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 22.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV Builds (Compare 635 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback