IBM System x3200 M3 -[7327PAA]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM System x3200 M3 -[7327PAA]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 94Y6038
Memory13.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 13:12
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
Node 1 Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 122
53% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 263
28% 224 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700
Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ibm-esxs VPBA300C3ETS11 N 300GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A496
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 79 75 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 70
SusWrite 80.5
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.4
250% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Maxtor 7L250S0 251GB-$91
23GB free
Firmware: 1GM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 53.8
Write 58.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 56.5
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0
140% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 35%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
11GB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 98 86 89 92 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 56
Write 58.8
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 92.3
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
null MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3200 M3 -[7327PAA]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: IBM System x3200 M3 -[7327PAA]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback