Today's hottest deals

Acer AO725

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AO725  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZA10_BZ
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121227
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '21 at 03:23
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 42.2
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 22.7
19% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 21.7
8-Core 22.3
3% 22 Pts
64-Core 21.9
1% 21.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Acer(1025 0740) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 35 40 40 36 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 74.8
Write 78.1
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 36.6
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32%
Great: 43%
GPX Audio Player 1GB
1GB free, PID 5667
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.83% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.7
2% 1.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
ST310005 28AS 1TB
138GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 19
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 23.6
29% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S16C11G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.56% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.8
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.7
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AO725 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer AO725

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback