Today's hottest deals

Positivo POS-PARS760GCD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPositivo POS-PARS760GCD  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PARS760GCD
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110412
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 850
Socket 938, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 95.2
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 69.3
48% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 124
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 220
PwrHis(1787 5220) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.98% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.3
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.98%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 61 70 52 23 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 65
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 49.3
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
351GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 81 78 66 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 78.9
Write 62.1
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 76.1
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PARS760GCD Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PARS760GCD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback