Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Dual-Core AMD Opteron 2220 41 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 41.3 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 55.6 30% 46.4 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 146 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 793 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Lighting 11.7 Reflection 12 Parallax 5.8 10% 9.83 fps	MRender 9.6 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 3.8 6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 100 100 101 105 105 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 125 Write 105 Mixed 96.3 SusWrite 99 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 21.5 72% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23.4 DQ Write 67.7 DQ Mixed 27.6 26% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 65GB 1,017 User benchmarks, average bench 19% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 24351stBench 43%, 91 samples	4x
CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 84351stBench 42%, 19 samples	1x
CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 23561stBench 40%, 37 samples	1x

SSD
0 480GBCt480bx5Bench 58%, 896 samples	1x
SD720 256GBTranscendBench 74%, 312 samples	1x
KingFast 240GBBench 58%, 4,155 samples	1x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16