Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 53
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 176
57% 104 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 608
55% 462 Pts
64-Core 2,440
151% 2,440 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 55.4
52% 60.8 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 56
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 424 249 288 284 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 429
Mixed 425
SusWrite 322
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 41.7
140% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 347
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 129%
WD10E 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01R.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 141 141 145 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 143
Write 131
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 141
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 90%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.7 5.9 4.3 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 7
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 5.6
15% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 12.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $62
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback