| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180116 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 14 '21 at 07:36 |
| Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
82% 149 Pts
|
78% 641 Pts
|
57% 928 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Dell(1028 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.37
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
27% 33.7 fps
|
25% 31.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 138 128 134 135 128 MB/s
|
82.5%
Excellent
|
58% 261 MB/s
|
152% 54.1 MB/s
|
122% 186 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
830GB free
Firmware: 2BA30003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 104 104 104 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
60% 81.7 MB/s
|
149% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
93% 32.6 GB/s
|
80% 27.9 GB/s
|
48% 83.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M Builds (Compare 147 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 52x |
| Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples | 20x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 16x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $313 |