Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory68GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 68GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory51.7 GB free of 68 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 09:35
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4108
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 58
2-Core 112
48% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 410
36% 306 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 429GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 39 41 42 47 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 129
Write 42.8
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 43.4
55% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
310% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 82%
Nutanix VDISK 752GB
331GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 44 41 42 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
Read 87.5
Write 45.3
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 43.7
46% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
240% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 107%
Nutanix VDISK 752GB
527GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 42 37 45 45 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
Read 117
Write 55.8
Mixed 75
SusWrite 42.8
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.4
249% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46%
Great: 107%
Nutanix VDISK 752GB
164GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 40 40 37 43 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
Read 93.3
Write 48.8
Mixed 67
SusWrite 41.3
47% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.7
305% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat Hat Hat Hat Hat 68GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 31.3
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 5.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback