Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 14:34
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 122
2-Core 210
83% 142 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 635
67% 538 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.5
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.4% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 107
Parallax 83.7
65% 90.1 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 83.3
Splatting 90.7
72% 87.4 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 955 645 502 514 509 510 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 902
Write 968
Mixed 123
SusWrite 606
145% 650 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 29.8
97% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 535
DQ Write 71
DQ Mixed 129
139% 245 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 117%
Great: 311%
SEMC SD CCR-80 32GB
8GB free, PID e134
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 15.5
Write 17.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 19.1
24% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.2
233% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 22.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 25.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback