HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A90h
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 154 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 282 33% 255 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 280 15 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 229A) 3GB CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.11.2 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.8% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 38.4 Parallax 60.1 37% 47.8 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 45.4 Splatting 26.9 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 162 160 150 147 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 234 Write 231 Mixed 222 SusWrite 165 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 26.9 99% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 87.7 DQ Mixed 124 97% 137 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 26GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 198 193 195 205 209 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.6% Good	Read 236 Write 231 Mixed 217 SusWrite 197 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 31.1 108% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 195 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 19GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 94 97 97 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 26.6 Mixed 41.9 SusWrite 96.4 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.3 221% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 174%
WD My Passport 0837 1TB 3,852 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 818GB free, PID 0837 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 28.8 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 30 39% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 23GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 5.7 5.1 6 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 23.6 Write 5.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 6 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 12 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.3 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: HP hAXOR.sUXOR.sOXOR

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R9 280AMDBench 28%, 15 samples	2x
Radeon R9 280XAMDBench 30%, 46 samples	1x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 9801AD80 9905403-198.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 38%, 5 samples	3x
9905403-198.A00LF 2x4GBUnknownBench 23%, 8 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $194

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $36
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16