Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S1350

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S1350  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S1350
Memory8.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100330
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 24 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 45.4
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 73.9
32% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 75.7
8-Core 75
10% 75.3 Pts
64-Core 74.1
5% 74.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 10.4
10% 12.6 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct120bx3 0 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 143 91 66 69 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 215
Write 177
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 89.3
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 20.2
65% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 41.1
33% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HU564403EP02 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S1350 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback