Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 213
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 526
56% 444 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 50.9
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 73.7
42% 60.8 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 43
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 246 231 220 210 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 481
Mixed 381
SusWrite 231
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 45.7
164% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 250
213% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
125GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 146 145 145 147 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 163
Write 151
Mixed 76
SusWrite 145
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 120 102 104 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 82
Write 123
Mixed 68
SusWrite 110
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 25.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 23.5
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback