Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82K0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82K0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 00:14
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 138
51% 91 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 692
61% 516 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A85) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 49.6
24% 36.5 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 43.8
40% 49 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 774 178 176 141 191 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 858
Write 816
Mixed 780
SusWrite 391
160% 711 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 49.5
162% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 404
304% 410 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 127%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 30.1
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 26.9
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82K0 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82K0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback